5 ESG Mistakes Thai CEOs Make Most Often (and How to Avoid Them)
Last updated: 10 Jun 2026
9 Views

ESG Mistakes happen in every organization. The ESG PRO team has worked with CEOs and senior executives of Thai companies, more than 1,000 organizations over 20 years. We've seen the same ESG Mistakes happen repeatedly, costing companies time and opportunities.
ESG Mistake 1: Treating ESG as CSR
The most common ESG Mistake. Many CEOs still think ESG means planting trees, community donations, or social activities.
This pushes ESG into CSR or Communications departments, disconnected from core business strategy.
How to avoid: Adjust mindset to ESG as Risk and Opportunity Management directly affecting Top Line and Bottom Line. Establish a Sustainability Committee at Board or C-Suite level. Tie ESG KPIs to Executive Compensation.
ESG Mistake 2: Reporting Before Strategy
Another ESG Mistake Thai companies repeat: starting with SD Report because it's an SEC compliance requirement.
Result: beautiful reports without real strategy behind them. These companies typically receive low ESG Ratings because analysts immediately see there's no substance.
How to avoid: Start with Double Materiality Assessment to identify key issues. Follow with ESG Strategy and Roadmap with clear KPIs. Then produce the report as an output, not a starting point.
ESG Mistake 3: Ignoring Scope 3
An ESG Mistake by many Thai companies: measuring Carbon Footprint only for Scope 1 and 2 because they're easy to calculate and control.
But Scope 3 (Supply Chain emissions) represents 70-90% of total Carbon Footprint in many industries.
How to avoid: Start with Scope 3 Screening to identify Material Categories. Invest in Supplier Engagement Programs. Use ESG Digital Platforms to systematically track Scope 3 data.
ESG Mistake 4: Different Consultants for Every Project
An ESG Mistake from cost-cutting: CEOs choose cheap consultants for individual projects. One firm does Materiality, another does Carbon Footprint, a third does Report.
Result: fragmented ESG strategy with no continuity, data that doesn't sync, low data quality. Total cost exceeds using one full-service consultant.
How to avoid: Choose End-to-End consultants so ESG data connects across Strategy, Implementation, Reporting, and Assurance.
ESG Mistake 5: Disconnecting ESG from Risk
Last ESG Mistake: Most ESG Risks directly affect business continuity, but most Thai companies still separate ESG from ERM and BCM.
When crisis strikes — flood, Human Rights audit, Greenwashing accusation — the company has no BCP covering ESG Risk.
How to avoid: Integrate ESG Risk into the corporate Risk Register. Use COSO ERM 2017 or ISO 31000 as framework. Develop BCP covering Climate Disaster.
Checklist to Avoid ESG Mistakes
Try answering these for yourself: Is your company's ESG tied to core business strategy? Do Board and C-Suite have ESG KPIs in performance evaluations?
Have you done a Double Materiality Assessment in the past 2 years? Do you measure Scope 3 Emissions? Is ESG Risk in your company's Risk Register?
If you answered 'no' to more than 2 questions, it's time to seriously rethink your ESG strategy.
The biggest ESG Mistake isn't doing ESG wrong. It's not starting at all.
ESG Mistake 1: Treating ESG as CSR
The most common ESG Mistake. Many CEOs still think ESG means planting trees, community donations, or social activities.
This pushes ESG into CSR or Communications departments, disconnected from core business strategy.
How to avoid: Adjust mindset to ESG as Risk and Opportunity Management directly affecting Top Line and Bottom Line. Establish a Sustainability Committee at Board or C-Suite level. Tie ESG KPIs to Executive Compensation.
ESG Mistake 2: Reporting Before Strategy
Another ESG Mistake Thai companies repeat: starting with SD Report because it's an SEC compliance requirement.
Result: beautiful reports without real strategy behind them. These companies typically receive low ESG Ratings because analysts immediately see there's no substance.
How to avoid: Start with Double Materiality Assessment to identify key issues. Follow with ESG Strategy and Roadmap with clear KPIs. Then produce the report as an output, not a starting point.
ESG Mistake 3: Ignoring Scope 3
An ESG Mistake by many Thai companies: measuring Carbon Footprint only for Scope 1 and 2 because they're easy to calculate and control.
But Scope 3 (Supply Chain emissions) represents 70-90% of total Carbon Footprint in many industries.
How to avoid: Start with Scope 3 Screening to identify Material Categories. Invest in Supplier Engagement Programs. Use ESG Digital Platforms to systematically track Scope 3 data.
ESG Mistake 4: Different Consultants for Every Project
An ESG Mistake from cost-cutting: CEOs choose cheap consultants for individual projects. One firm does Materiality, another does Carbon Footprint, a third does Report.
Result: fragmented ESG strategy with no continuity, data that doesn't sync, low data quality. Total cost exceeds using one full-service consultant.
How to avoid: Choose End-to-End consultants so ESG data connects across Strategy, Implementation, Reporting, and Assurance.
ESG Mistake 5: Disconnecting ESG from Risk
Last ESG Mistake: Most ESG Risks directly affect business continuity, but most Thai companies still separate ESG from ERM and BCM.
When crisis strikes — flood, Human Rights audit, Greenwashing accusation — the company has no BCP covering ESG Risk.
How to avoid: Integrate ESG Risk into the corporate Risk Register. Use COSO ERM 2017 or ISO 31000 as framework. Develop BCP covering Climate Disaster.
Checklist to Avoid ESG Mistakes
Try answering these for yourself: Is your company's ESG tied to core business strategy? Do Board and C-Suite have ESG KPIs in performance evaluations?
Have you done a Double Materiality Assessment in the past 2 years? Do you measure Scope 3 Emissions? Is ESG Risk in your company's Risk Register?
If you answered 'no' to more than 2 questions, it's time to seriously rethink your ESG strategy.
The biggest ESG Mistake isn't doing ESG wrong. It's not starting at all.
Related Content
SET ESG Ratings คือ ผลการประเมินหุ้นยั่งยืนของบริษัทจดทะเบียนที่ตลาดหลักทรัพย์แห่งประเทศไทย (กลต.) จัดทำขึ้น โดยประเมินจากข้อมูลผลการดำเนินงาน E S G
หลังจาก ระยะเปลี่ยนผ่าน (Transitional Phase) ของมาตรการCBAM Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism ของสหภาพยุโรปสิ้นสุดลง
ในช่วงไม่กี่ปีที่ผ่านมา คำว่า Net Zero กลายเป็นคำที่หลายองค์กรไทยให้ความสำคัญและถูกบรรจุเป็น เป้าหมายใหญ่ ในการดำเนินธุรกิจ แต่เส้นทางสู่ Net Zero ไม่ใช่เรื่องง่าย เพราะแม้องค์กรจะสามารถลดการปล่อยก๊าซเรือนกระจกได้มากเพียงใด ก็ยังคงมี การปล่อยที่เลี่ยงไม่ได้ อยู่เสมอ เช่น การใช้พลังงานในกระบวนการผลิต การขนส่ง หรือการใช้งานผลิตภัณฑ์ นี่คือเหตุผลว่าทำไม Carbon Credit และกลยุทธ์ Offsetting/Insetting จึงเข้ามามีบทบาทสำคัญ โดยเฉพาะในประเทศไทยที่มี ตลาดคาร์บอนเครดิต T-VER เป็นกลไกสำคัญในการสนับสนุนให้องค์กรเดินหน้าไปสู่เป้าหมาย Net Zero ได้จริง


