5 ESG Mistakes Thai CEOs Make Most Often (and How to Avoid Them)
Last updated: 10 Jun 2026
10 Views

ESG Mistakes happen in every organization. The ESG PRO team has worked with CEOs and senior executives of Thai companies, more than 1,000 organizations over 20 years. We've seen the same ESG Mistakes happen repeatedly, costing companies time and opportunities.
ESG Mistake 1: Treating ESG as CSR
The most common ESG Mistake. Many CEOs still think ESG means planting trees, community donations, or social activities.
This pushes ESG into CSR or Communications departments, disconnected from core business strategy.
How to avoid: Adjust mindset to ESG as Risk and Opportunity Management directly affecting Top Line and Bottom Line. Establish a Sustainability Committee at Board or C-Suite level. Tie ESG KPIs to Executive Compensation.
ESG Mistake 2: Reporting Before Strategy
Another ESG Mistake Thai companies repeat: starting with SD Report because it's an SEC compliance requirement.
Result: beautiful reports without real strategy behind them. These companies typically receive low ESG Ratings because analysts immediately see there's no substance.
How to avoid: Start with Double Materiality Assessment to identify key issues. Follow with ESG Strategy and Roadmap with clear KPIs. Then produce the report as an output, not a starting point.
ESG Mistake 3: Ignoring Scope 3
An ESG Mistake by many Thai companies: measuring Carbon Footprint only for Scope 1 and 2 because they're easy to calculate and control.
But Scope 3 (Supply Chain emissions) represents 70-90% of total Carbon Footprint in many industries.
How to avoid: Start with Scope 3 Screening to identify Material Categories. Invest in Supplier Engagement Programs. Use ESG Digital Platforms to systematically track Scope 3 data.
ESG Mistake 4: Different Consultants for Every Project
An ESG Mistake from cost-cutting: CEOs choose cheap consultants for individual projects. One firm does Materiality, another does Carbon Footprint, a third does Report.
Result: fragmented ESG strategy with no continuity, data that doesn't sync, low data quality. Total cost exceeds using one full-service consultant.
How to avoid: Choose End-to-End consultants so ESG data connects across Strategy, Implementation, Reporting, and Assurance.
ESG Mistake 5: Disconnecting ESG from Risk
Last ESG Mistake: Most ESG Risks directly affect business continuity, but most Thai companies still separate ESG from ERM and BCM.
When crisis strikes — flood, Human Rights audit, Greenwashing accusation — the company has no BCP covering ESG Risk.
How to avoid: Integrate ESG Risk into the corporate Risk Register. Use COSO ERM 2017 or ISO 31000 as framework. Develop BCP covering Climate Disaster.
Checklist to Avoid ESG Mistakes
Try answering these for yourself: Is your company's ESG tied to core business strategy? Do Board and C-Suite have ESG KPIs in performance evaluations?
Have you done a Double Materiality Assessment in the past 2 years? Do you measure Scope 3 Emissions? Is ESG Risk in your company's Risk Register?
If you answered 'no' to more than 2 questions, it's time to seriously rethink your ESG strategy.
The biggest ESG Mistake isn't doing ESG wrong. It's not starting at all.
ESG Mistake 1: Treating ESG as CSR
The most common ESG Mistake. Many CEOs still think ESG means planting trees, community donations, or social activities.
This pushes ESG into CSR or Communications departments, disconnected from core business strategy.
How to avoid: Adjust mindset to ESG as Risk and Opportunity Management directly affecting Top Line and Bottom Line. Establish a Sustainability Committee at Board or C-Suite level. Tie ESG KPIs to Executive Compensation.
ESG Mistake 2: Reporting Before Strategy
Another ESG Mistake Thai companies repeat: starting with SD Report because it's an SEC compliance requirement.
Result: beautiful reports without real strategy behind them. These companies typically receive low ESG Ratings because analysts immediately see there's no substance.
How to avoid: Start with Double Materiality Assessment to identify key issues. Follow with ESG Strategy and Roadmap with clear KPIs. Then produce the report as an output, not a starting point.
ESG Mistake 3: Ignoring Scope 3
An ESG Mistake by many Thai companies: measuring Carbon Footprint only for Scope 1 and 2 because they're easy to calculate and control.
But Scope 3 (Supply Chain emissions) represents 70-90% of total Carbon Footprint in many industries.
How to avoid: Start with Scope 3 Screening to identify Material Categories. Invest in Supplier Engagement Programs. Use ESG Digital Platforms to systematically track Scope 3 data.
ESG Mistake 4: Different Consultants for Every Project
An ESG Mistake from cost-cutting: CEOs choose cheap consultants for individual projects. One firm does Materiality, another does Carbon Footprint, a third does Report.
Result: fragmented ESG strategy with no continuity, data that doesn't sync, low data quality. Total cost exceeds using one full-service consultant.
How to avoid: Choose End-to-End consultants so ESG data connects across Strategy, Implementation, Reporting, and Assurance.
ESG Mistake 5: Disconnecting ESG from Risk
Last ESG Mistake: Most ESG Risks directly affect business continuity, but most Thai companies still separate ESG from ERM and BCM.
When crisis strikes — flood, Human Rights audit, Greenwashing accusation — the company has no BCP covering ESG Risk.
How to avoid: Integrate ESG Risk into the corporate Risk Register. Use COSO ERM 2017 or ISO 31000 as framework. Develop BCP covering Climate Disaster.
Checklist to Avoid ESG Mistakes
Try answering these for yourself: Is your company's ESG tied to core business strategy? Do Board and C-Suite have ESG KPIs in performance evaluations?
Have you done a Double Materiality Assessment in the past 2 years? Do you measure Scope 3 Emissions? Is ESG Risk in your company's Risk Register?
If you answered 'no' to more than 2 questions, it's time to seriously rethink your ESG strategy.
The biggest ESG Mistake isn't doing ESG wrong. It's not starting at all.
Related Content
GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) มีหลายตัวชี้วัดที่ทำให้องค์กรต่างๆ สามารถรายงานความยั่งยืนได้ในหลายเรื่อง องค์กรในไทยที่เลือกใช้ GRI อาจจะเน้นบางหัวข้อที่เหมาะสมและสอดคล้องกับบริบททางธุรกิจและสังคมของประเทศ
เมื่อองค์กรเน้นที่การเพิ่มคุณค่าสำหรับผู้มีส่วนได้ส่วนเสียทุกฝ่ายผ่าน ESG Plan จะส่งผลดีต่อการเติบโตของกำไรและความยั่งยืนของธุรกิจระยะยาว
การเปลี่ยนแปลงสภาพภูมิอากาศทำให้โลกกำลังมองหากลไกทางเศรษฐกิจเพื่อช่วยลดการปล่อยก๊าซเรือนกระจก หนึ่งในเครื่องมือสำคัญคือ คาร์บอนเครดิต (Carbon Credit) ที่องค์กรสามารถใช้ชดเชยการปล่อยก๊าซเรือนกระจกได้ แต่ระบบซื้อขายคาร์บอนเครดิตที่ใช้อยู่ในปัจจุบันยังมีปัญหาใหญ่คือ ขาดความโปร่งใสและตรวจสอบได้ยากนี่จึงเป็นจุดเริ่มต้นของการนำ Blockchain Technology เข้ามาใช้ เพื่อสร้างระบบการซื้อขายคาร์บอนเครดิตที่เชื่อถือได้ ตรวจสอบย้อนกลับได้ และลดความเสี่ยง Greenwashing ได้อย่างมีประสิทธิภาพ


